Evaluate the current SAT process based on evidence from this
article.
Based on this article, how prepared do you
feel you are to take (or retake) the SAT’s writing portion? What practice or
instruction might you still need?
I feel that this writing essay is a bit
unfair. Many people probably don't understand that the accurateness of their
information isn't being evaluated. I feel that there should be two different
writing parts, one on time and one on accurateness. I feel that testing a
student while under pressure in a good thing, so that you can see how they
perform under those circumstances. However, I feel that accurate information is
important as well. I feel that if dates and names aren’t right, then the
student has no idea what they’re saying. The whole essay is basically about
improvising. The one quote that grabbed my attention the most was “There’s
really no concern about factual accuracy,” says Gere. “In fact, the makers of
the SAT have indicated that in scoring it really doesn’t matter if you say that
the War of 1812 occurred in 1817. The complete lack of attention to any kind of
accuracy of information conveys a very strange notion of what good writing
might be.” I just couldn't quite believe that this is how they actually graded
the tests. I also couldn't believe that they typically only spend two to three
minutes reading and evaluating the essays. I honestly think that these essays
may give a false sense of greatness about the students writing them, because
someone with a 2.5 GPA may be more persuasive than a 5.0 GPA student. But in
that twenty-five minute period, that difference in intelligence level might not
be noticed. Overall, I think that the SAT is a good way to evaluate which
colleges you can get into, but it may also need to be tweaked a little bit in
order to become more positively affective to students and their futures.
No comments:
Post a Comment